How to Write a Conclusion or Discussion Section for a Lab.
For example, the discussion of a case report will be much shorter than that of an original article which describes six figures. However, the discussion should not be an in-depth review of the literature, but rather a discussion of the findings as they relate to published studies. A good rule of thumb is to aim for approximately 1500 words.
State how your results extend the findings of previous studies. If your findings are preliminary, suggest future studies that need to be carried out. At the end of your Discussion and Conclusions sections, state your main conclusions once again.
The body of your essay should follow the path left by the introduction. The body should be well arranged according to the structure you created to guide you. The outline should dictate how the points follow each other in your essay. Each paragraph should start with a certain aspect of the topic it will address.
Presenting Results. Authors face the significant challenge of presenting their results in the Journal of Pediatric Psychology (JPP) completely, yet succinctly and writing a convincing discussion section that highlights the importance of their research. The third and final in a series of editorials (Drotar, 2009a,b), this article provides guidance for authors to prepare effective results and.
Scientific papers based on experimentation typically include five predominant sections: Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion.This structure is a widely accepted approach to writing a research paper, and has specific sections that parallel the scientific method.
Writing a scientific report When you are asked to write a report on investigations you carry out in labs or when you go on fieldwork, it is important to recognise that these reports are structured differently from other types of research reports and essays.
Yet, often, young doctors do not have much training, if any, in the art of writing a scientific article. For clinicians, in particular, the clinical workload can be such that research and scientific writing are seen to be secondary activities that are not an immediate priority, and to which only small amounts of time can be devoted on an irregular basis.